Energy security relates to how the electricity grid or 'power system' reacts to events that may influence it. Broadly, it includes ensuring there is sufficient generation to meet demand on the highest demand day along with the grid's capability to react and recover securely to major events like faults or generation tripping, termed 'contingencies'.

The ability of the grid to respond to events and contingencies is termed ‘power system security’. Because the grid is balanced in real time – where the generation (supply) must equal demand plus any transmission losses – power system security is an outcome of all the parts of the grid working together. Ensuring the power system is secure requires close monitoring and coordination, which is the role of the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO).

Energy security and the transition to renewable energy

A secure energy system is a fundamental factor of production in modern economies the world over. Yet these electricity grids, along with our own, are going through a technological transformation, driven by a move away from conventional gas and coal generation technologies and towards renewable energy and energy storage technologies. The objective of a transition towards renewable energy is to reduce emissions and tap into the competitive and energy independence advantages that come with using renewable energy resources. Of course this objective has to be delivered alongside energy security constraints.

In Australia, over 1.6 million homes and businesses already have solar on their rooftops and investment in large-scale solar and wind farms dominates over conventional generation technologies. This new capability and capacity is coming online at a time when the National Electricity Market (NEM) is expected to deal with the withdrawal of many large conventional coal generators that have approached the end of their useful lifespan. Emissions abatement efforts are expected to accelerate these closures.

The volume and extent of change is enormous and requires a clear plan.

The 'Finkel Review'

In October 2016 the Council of Australian Governments Energy Council (COAG Energy Council) initiated a major review of the NEM chaired by Australia’s Chief Scientist, Alan Finkel AO. The objective of the Independent Review into the Future Security of the NEM is to design a blueprint for how we get from the current market to one that achieves committed emissions abatement targets for the electricity sector* while ensuring a secure energy system at a reasonable cost.

The Final Report will be submitted to the COAG Energy Council on 6 June 2017.

*Currently undefined although Australia’s commitment to the COP21 process is for a 26-28 per cent reduction in emissions by 2030, from 2005 emission levels.

The Clean Energy Council’s views on how to design a clean and secure energy system

In February 2017 the Clean Energy Council made a comprehensive submission to the ‘Finkel Review’. In order to bring some of the key concepts behind this submission into the debate, the Clean Energy Council has also prepared a series of articles that look at specific issues in more detail. These are summarised below.

Energy security definitions

  • Synchronous generators have spinning magnetic fields that keep frequency close to 50 Hz. These  magnetic fields are locked in synchronism across the grid, and synchronous generators rely on them to operate stably.

  • Non-synchronous generators are wind, solar and battery storage that use power electronics to follow the grid frequency in order to inject power into the grid, but can operate in a range of grid conditions.

  • Grid reliability is the ability of the grid and generation assets to deliver power at the right quality to customers and is measured by the number of hours in a year that an average customer has no power.

  • Grid or power system security is the ability of the grid to quickly and stably respond to and recover from major disturbances. It is usually measured by how close frequency stays to 50 Hz during these events.

  • Energy security is about the ability of the whole electricity system and the energy sources that supply it such as wind, solar, water storages, gas and coal, to deliver electricity to customers.

  • Frequency is an outcome of supply and demand balance and is kept close to 50 Hz with the Frequency Control Ancillary Services (FCAS) market to provide this balance. The Australian Energy Market Operator operates the FCAS market, which has historically tended towards changes in generation (supply) rather than demand.

  • Rate of change of frequency or ROCOF is the steepness of a change in frequency following a contingency event.

  • Inertia is the power system’s immediate response to a contingency event. The level of inertia dictates the rate of change of frequency away from 50 Hz immediately after the event. Inertia allows for time to bring the power systems other emergency frequency control mechanisms into assist and restore frequency.

  • Fast frequency response is the fast-acting frequency control capability that can be delivered from a battery storage system or wind turbine generator. Acting like a synthetic form of inertia it swiftly injects (or consumers) power into (or from) the grid to push against a high rate of change of frequency event, with an aim to assist in restoring the supply-demand balance and therefore the frequency.

Paper One: Arresting frequency changes in a modern electricity system

Download the paper

Historically, as with other large grids, the NEM has relied on conventional coal, gas and hydro generators to provide mechanical inertia and respond rapidly to suppress rapid changes in frequency following a shock or disturbance. However, it is becoming clear that this can no longer be taken for granted as our energy mix moves away from conventional generators towards large-scale and distributed renewable energy and energy storage. Other generation sources and enabling systems in the grid must contribute alongside the conventional synchronous generators.

These technologies are available now and can be deployed to ensure the continued levels of security expected of a modern electricity grid. Failing to tap into them is a missed opportunity that could have significant ramifications for future energy security. Transforming our energy system is not a technology problem. However, it is important to ensure that regulatory and market settings provide the necessary frameworks that look past conventional grid design to bring new technologies into the market, rather than relying on outdated assumptions.

This article investigates the issue of inertia, how it works with the power grid and how renewables and storage can help using currently available technology.

  • ‘Synchronous’ generators have large heavy electrical rotors and turbines that spin to generate power. Traditional power grid design assumes that the system’s inertia is created by the combination of these spinning masses.

    Importantly, inertia only acts to manage the rate of change of frequency, or ROCOF. It slows the change, buying time for additional fast-acting protection schemes to act to restore the supply-demand balance thus arrest the change in frequency. The extent of inertia in a system becomes most apparent when a significant contingency event occurs. Lower inertia systems provide less time for the emergency controls to kick-in.

    Because our grids were originally designed around these traditional solutions, it has been assumed that inertia is always sufficient. To date the rules that govern generator connection have not considered inertial contribution from any generator. We’ve taken it for granted. Despite this, it is also clear that our fleet of thermal generation is quickly ageing with an average age of 40 expected to be reached in the coming decade. Replacement of these assets is unlikely to take the same form, with wind and solar generation likely to dominate.

  • While it is clear that the inherent mechanical inertia from traditional generators has played an important role in power systems, the performance of these generators during large disturbances is less well understood as they too may become unstable in low inertia conditions.

    In an environment where new technologies are expected to support power system security it is essential to ensure that the existing system is very well understood. It is critical that all forms of generation work in concert to support power system security. Future expectations are for the closure of many of the existing synchronous generators so the market has to look beyond conventional technologies.

  • Wind turbine generators can draw upon the kinetic energy stored in the generator and rotating blades to provide a boost of power if triggered by a system disturbance or contingency. Quebec has been paving the way with wind turbines being used in this way. Although the grid and market is quite different, Québécoise standards have been in place requiring this capability since 2011 and ongoing improvements are pushing wind turbine generator suppliers to respond with even more sophisticated generator performance solutions.

  • Solar PV and energy storage inverters are static devices so, unlike a wind turbine, have no moving parts from which extra energy can be drawn. However, the solid state nature of power inverters provides these systems with an ability to switch and change operation almost instantaneously. Where storage is included or where generation is available, this energy injection is highly controllable.

    The technology works by continuously measuring frequency to detect the ROCOF. If triggered by a high ROCOF these devices can inject or absorb power very quickly in an attempt to slow the change in frequency and support the system’s inertia. Experience is rapidly growing with these technologies as they are deployed here in Australia and overseas. These solutions must form an integral part of the future design of Australian grids.

  • There are clearly opportunities to tap into new technologies that are being missed in Australia. Collectively, these opportunities and continued technological advancements show that it is not technology per se, but the failure to prepare for technological change that will impact power system security.

    There is currently no standard for inertia or inertia substitutes like fast frequency response for generators in Australia. Nor have expectations been placed on new renewable energy generators or storage technologies to provide this in the past.

    The following actions should be pursued to achieve a modern energy system that calls upon the diverse technological solutions available to support it:

    1. Establish appropriate standards for frequency conditions that apply to all technologies and focus on the speed and accuracy of their contribution to arresting the change in frequency following a disturbance.
    2. Accelerate trials of fast frequency response from wind turbines and inverter-based technologies to further prove this solution in the local context.
    3. Review the tuning of legacy synchronous generators and undertake testing to demonstrate the performance and capability of the fleet under high rates of change of frequency.